Three members of the Senate Intelligence Committee slammed...
Three members of the Senate Intelligence Committee slammed a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act bill that recently cleared their committee. The FISA Improvements Act (S-1681), a product of Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., passed 11-4. It “would explicitly permit the government to…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
engage in dragnet collection as long as there were rules about when officials could look at these phone records,” wrote Ron Wyden, D-Ore., Mark Udall, D-Colo., and Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., in a joint New York Times op-ed Tuesday (http://nyti.ms/1b2KEwt). “It would also give intelligence agencies wide latitude to conduct warrantless searches for Americans’ phone calls and emails.” They all voted against Feinstein’s proposal during the Oct. 31 committee vote. Feinstein recently attached the FISA Improvements Act as an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (CD Nov 25 p10), and these senators also proposed their own NDAA amendments on surveillance law. Wyden, Udall and Heinrich touted their Intelligence Oversight and Surveillance Reform Act, S-1551, which they say would end bulk collection of phone metadata, create a constitutional advocate for the FISA court and amend FISA Section 702, among other changes. That bill now has 13 co-sponsors, including Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who introduced a similar proposal called the USA Freedom Act a month after they did. Leahy’s bill (S-1599) has 18 co-sponsors, including all three of these Senate Intelligence members. “We will push to hold a comprehensive reform debate on the Senate floor,” the three said in the op-ed.